A Case Study: When Speech Therapy Taught Thinking, Not Just Talking

January 22nd, 2026
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Written by

Brijith Maria Anto

Junior Subject Specialist – SLP

When we hear the term speech therapy, we often imagine children who struggle to speak — unclear words, short sentences, or limited vocabulary.
But speech therapy is not always about producing more words. Sometimes, it is about helping a child think, judge, and respond meaningfully in real-life situations.

This became very clear to me while working with an 8-year-old child diagnosed with high-functioning autism.

Case Snapshot

The child had fluent speech and well-developed language skills.
He could answer questions accurately, follow instructions, and express himself clearly when prompted.

Yet, his social interaction was poor.

He wanted to interact with others but always needed a push to begin. Once prompted, his responses sounded rehearsed — almost like by-hearted lines. While he could identify emotions easily, he struggled to understand how to respond when someone else expressed those emotions.

One striking difficulty was question generation.
He could answer almost anything — but when it was his turn to ask a question, he did not know what to ask. His questions followed a fixed, textbook-like pattern, with little flexibility based on the situation.

What Was Really Difficult?

The challenge was not speech or language.

The real difficulties lay in:

  • Judgement
  • Perspective-taking
  • Flexible thinking
  • Problem-solving in social situations

He had ideas, but struggled to organise them and decide which idea fit which context — especially during group interactions. Starting a conversation, continuing it naturally, or shifting topics felt difficult because he relied heavily on fixed patterns.

Therapy Focus: Moving Beyond Structure

Therapy did not rely only on structured techniques or worksheets.

Instead, sessions involved natural conversations — talking casually about different topics, sharing thoughts, and exploring ideas without a “right answer.”

Real-life hypothetical situations were introduced during these conversations, such as:

“Oh no… the teacher has to go home alone. It’s dark, and she feels scared. What can she do?”

The aim was not a perfect sentence — but thinking of multiple solutions, understanding emotions, and learning to judge situations.

Gradually, peer interactions were also introduced. He began to understand that conversations are shared — one person does not always lead, questions can come from either side, and new topics can be introduced naturally.

What Changed?

As his thinking became more flexible, his communication changed.

He began to:

  • Initiate more naturally
  • Move away from rehearsed patterns
  • Respond better to others’ emotions
  • Understand why certain responses fit certain situations

His speech did not improve because he learned more words —
It improved because he learned how to think in social contexts.

Key Takeaway

Speech therapy is not always about teaching a child what to say.

Sometimes, it is about helping them understand:

  • What fits the situation
  • How another person might feel
  • How conversations naturally flow

Because real communication does not begin with speech.
It begins with thinking.

At XceptionalLEARNING, our digital therapy platform supports meaningful communication by focusing on real-life thinking skills, guided by licensed therapists online. Through inclusive education digital projects and practical digital tools for inclusive education, we empower clinicians and families—contact us to learn more.

A-Case-Study-When-Speech-Therapy-Taught-Thinking-Not-Just-Talking